International Full Size Jeep Association
Home Forums Reader's Rigs Tech Library Trail Stories FSJ-List
International Full Size Jeep Association  

Go Back   International Full Size Jeep Association > Tire Kickin' > Off-Road FSJ Tech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2007, 06:47 AM
orangecherokee's Avatar
orangecherokee orangecherokee is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Location: Bethel, NC
Posts: 5,408
If you don't do anything for Tellico....

At the minimum do this... http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=614705

Read the plan and write a letter/email. I already have and I encourage all of you to do the same. If you remotely have a small interest, please write a letter to save this area. Thank you.

#1

edit: for the people that hate pirate.

Dear Interested Public,

I am seeking comments on two proposals to establish new Forest Supervisor’s Orders on the Upper Tellico Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Area in Cherokee County, North Carolina. This OHV area, located 15 miles north of Murphy on the North Carolina/Tennessee state line, includes approximately 38 miles of existing roads and trails that are managed for motorized recreation use. The following actions are being proposed:

1. A Forest Supervisor’s Order prohibiting motorized vehicles on Lower Trail # 2, Trail # 7, and Trail # 9, duration of order not to exceed one year or until a reasonable plan is in place to prevent adverse impacts to the aquatic resource.
2. A Forest Supervisor’s Order prohibiting winter-time motorized vehicle use on the Upper Tellico OHV Trail System from January 1 to March 31 each year. This would include all trails in the system except Trail # 1 and the upper section of Trail # 2 which would remain open as system roads used by vehicle types normally found on public roads.

The following persons would be exempted from these orders:

• Persons with a permit from the Forest Service specifically authorizing the otherwise prohibited act or omission.
• Any Federal, State, or local officer, or member of an organized rescue or firefighting force in the performance of an official duty.
• Owners or lessees of land in the Closure Area are exempt from the prohibitions listed above to the extent necessary to gain access to their land.
• Residents in the Closure Area are exempt from the prohibitions to the extent necessary to gain access to their residences.

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTIONS

These actions are needed to correct and/or repair ongoing impacts to the aquatic resource caused by sediment entering area waters from the Tellico trail system.

Action # 1, prohibitions on Lower Trail # 2, Trail # 7, and Trail #9, is needed to provide immediate short-term resource protection measures. The greatest impact to area waters is coming from the movement of sediment off these three trails, as indicated by observation and on-site measurements of turbidity and suspended sediment concentrations.

Action # 2, winter-time closure of the OHV Area, is needed to provide resource protection. Forest Service personnel have observed that most of the damage to the trail tread occurs during the winter freeze/thaw period from January to late March, at which time soils are subject to increased rutting and displacement.

These actions would implement direction in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests Land and Resource Management Plan to emphasize protection of perennial and intermittent streams in compliance with North Carolina Forest Practice Guidelines Related to Water Quality.

The actions would be implemented pursuant to 36 CFR 261.50 (b) which states, “The Chief, each Regional Forester, each Experiment Station Director, the Administrator of the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit and each Forest Supervisor may issue orders which close or restrict the use of any National Forest System road or trail within the area over which he has jurisdiction.”

Before a final decision is made I welcome your comments. Please make your comments as specific as possible along with supporting reasons why you believe your comments should be considered. Please include your name and address in any correspondence.

Your comments may be sent to Tusquitee District Ranger, 123 Woodland Drive, Murphy, NC 28906. Comments may also be sent via email to
comments-southern-north-carolina-nan...itee@fs.fed.us.

We would appreciate receiving your comments by October 17, 2007.

Thank you for your time and interest in our management activities on the Tusquitee Ranger District.

Sincerely,

/s/ Tina R. Tilley, Acting District Ranger
TINA R. TILLEY, Acting District Ranger
__________________
Need a Willys Pickup to restore

Places to Wheel in the Southeast

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topgun2mo
I would think boxing would limit the amount the frame could flex over obstacles which I think IMO would be a bad thing. I would think you would want all the articulation possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny019
I'm not saying lockers don't improve the performance of your rig, just that they're overrated.

Last edited by orangecherokee : 09-19-2007 at 12:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:35 PM
Dirtball's Avatar
Dirtball Dirtball is offline
Bleedin' Gasoline
 
Join Date: Apr 10, 2006
Location: Oneonta, AL
Posts: 2,086
And join the Southern Fourwheel Drive Association, if not through a club then as an individual member. Your money there goes to fight just these kinds of battles.
__________________
Paul
1979 Cherokee N/T
360/TH400/Qtrac/D44s/rear Lock-right
6 inch Hell Creek all spring lift
34x10.50 Super Swamper LTBs
http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g1...t/100_1394.jpg
http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g1...t/100_1390.jpg
http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g1...100_1387-2.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-19-2007, 01:06 PM
orangecherokee's Avatar
orangecherokee orangecherokee is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Location: Bethel, NC
Posts: 5,408
updated.
__________________
Need a Willys Pickup to restore

Places to Wheel in the Southeast

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topgun2mo
I would think boxing would limit the amount the frame could flex over obstacles which I think IMO would be a bad thing. I would think you would want all the articulation possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny019
I'm not saying lockers don't improve the performance of your rig, just that they're overrated.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-19-2007, 03:22 PM
Big-wagon87's Avatar
Big-wagon87 Big-wagon87 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 29, 2006
Location: Hazard KY
Posts: 209
Letter wrote nick!! I have a degree in geology/hydrology and work in coal mining. I gave them some ideas that work to controll soil erosion that are cheap and that help both the wildlife and orv users.

You would be surprised at the difference that closing a month in the spring thaw would make. it would probably cut the problem in half. once the spring rains and thaw are over there would be almost zero effects on the streams.
CH
__________________
87 wag on 44's 360 mod on propane, np435, 203/205 doubler w/lowmax
76 cherokee cheif 401
bunches of baby jeeps
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
corner corner