|
View Poll Results: WWYD?
|
|
Keep it 2 bbl
|
 
|
10 |
23.81% |
|
Go to the 4 bbl
|
 
|
30 |
71.43% |
|
Don't go TBI / don't go with Howell
|
 
|
2 |
4.76% |

04-30-2007, 08:34 AM
|
 |
Bleedin' Gasoline
|
|
Join Date: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Cordenons, Italy / Springfield, VT
Posts: 1,997
|
|
|
Need you guys to make up my mind
I'm fixin to push the button and buy the Howell TBI I keep asking questions about for my '88. I have 2 choices. I can stick with the stock 2 bbl setup or I can install an AMC 4 bbl non-EGR intake I have. Emissions aren't a problem. My AIR stuff is already gone. I've talked to the engineers at Howell's about the EGR. They assure me that as long as I tell them what I'm running (cam, intake, AIR, EGR...) they can tune it accordingly. So whatever I'm gonna do I need to tell them now when I order it. The biggest thing I'm worried about is rocking the boat by changing the intake and creating leaks by doing a crappy job, but that's on me I guess. So what would you do?
__________________
Corey
Wagless for now
Last edited by aerocorey : 04-30-2007 at 08:42 AM.
|

04-30-2007, 08:45 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 20, 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,058
|
|
Go with the 4 bbl. A friend of mine has it (and using a Howell TBI) and it runs just fine. Get the longer harness so that you can feed it through the pre-existing hole behind the brake pedal and hide the ECM on the passenger side.
You will LOVE TBI. I do. 
__________________
Ethan Brady
1987 Grand Wagoneer, slightly longer than stock.
www.bigscaryjeep.com
Don't mess with me. I once killed a living hinge.
|

04-30-2007, 08:48 AM
|
 |
Bleedin' Gasoline
|
|
Join Date: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Cordenons, Italy / Springfield, VT
Posts: 1,997
|
|
|
I don't have A/C anymore, turning it into onboard air. I bet I can run the harness through where the A/C lines used to pass through the firewall.
__________________
Corey
Wagless for now
|

04-30-2007, 10:27 AM
|
|
|
|
I would go with the 4bbl intake and the howell TBI. The way I figure it you can always change out the injectors to the size your engine wants and you can go as big as you want with the larger 4bbl intake. If you stay with the 2bbl then you may find you're limiting your intake size and thereby limiting your useful injector size.
|

04-30-2007, 10:55 AM
|
 |
Grease Monkey
|
|
Join Date: Nov 23, 2003
Location: Delhi, CA
Posts: 397
|
|
Heck, just the weight savings of going to an aluminum intake is worth it.  I'm running a Performer on my setup and it works great, but I already had one laying around. Never tried the stock intake, so I don't really have a comparison.
__________________
89 Grand Wagoneer, 360, 727, 229, D44s, 2.5" Rancho lift, 31x10.5 mud tires, Howell TBI on an Edelbrock intake, MSD TFI upgrade, Engle cam, Edelbrock shorty headers, Single 2.5" exhaust with 40-series Flowmaster, Milodon high-flow water pump, BJs Offroad aluminum cross-flow radiator.
Current Jeep Status: She's alive!!
|

04-30-2007, 11:03 AM
|
 |
Bleedin' Gasoline
|
|
Join Date: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Cordenons, Italy / Springfield, VT
Posts: 1,997
|
|
|
My 4 bbl isn't aluminum. It's a stock AMC 4 bbl from a Javelin.
__________________
Corey
Wagless for now
|

04-30-2007, 11:09 AM
|
 |
Master Mechanic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 13, 2004
Location: Marshfield, WI
Posts: 1,002
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aerocorey
My 4 bbl isn't aluminum. It's a stock AMC 4 bbl from a Javelin.
|
I would keep it simple, especially if you are doing the install yourself. Get the TBI working with the stock 2bbl manifold first.
You are dropping a big chunk of change for that system to mess it up with a 4bbl intake that seems very unlikely to provide much performance benefit or weight savings.
Bob
__________________
79 Cherokee S
|

04-30-2007, 11:15 AM
|
 |
One-man wolf pack
|
|
Join Date: Sep 20, 2005
Location: Sherwood, Orygun!
Posts: 5,437
|
|
|
jesus would run a tbi with a 2 barrel just to keep it simple.
Al
__________________
79 Cherokee Chief "Kronk" - TBI350/SM465/NP205
81 Toyota longbed - SOLD
91 Chevy K1500 - Over 300k!
90 XJ - 4.0/AW4/NP242, 5.5" lift, bushwhacker cutouts, sliders, bumpers, winch, 33's - FOR SALE -
08 Mazda CX-9, 273 hp - SOLD
07 Mazdaspeed3 - 263hp, 280ft/lbs tq - Zoom zoom!
|

04-30-2007, 11:21 AM
|
 |
Bleedin' Gasoline
|
|
Join Date: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Cordenons, Italy / Springfield, VT
Posts: 1,997
|
|
Why do people keep mentioning weight savings/lack of weight savings with reference to an intake manifold on a FSJ? I hereby declare a ban on mentioning the weight of an intake manifold for the duration of this thread unless it's a reference to ease of installation.
Do you guys really think a 4 bbl intake complicates things? Wouldn't you think it would be more troublesome to get it running right with a 2 bbl and then get it to run right with a 4 bbl? Isn't that like doing the entire job 2 times? I always ask my Airmen if they don't have time to do something right does that mean they have time to do it twice?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlsChopShop
jesus would run a tbi with a 2 barrel
|
chuckle, chuckle
__________________
Corey
Wagless for now
Last edited by aerocorey : 04-30-2007 at 11:25 AM.
|

04-30-2007, 11:28 AM
|
 |
Grease Monkey
|
|
Join Date: Nov 23, 2003
Location: Delhi, CA
Posts: 397
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aerocorey
My 4 bbl isn't aluminum. It's a stock AMC 4 bbl from a Javelin.
|
I wouldn't worry about it, then. The Howell only flows 500 cfm, so the stock 2-barrel should work fine. Other than the barrel configuration, I believe that the runners are similar, if not exactly the same. AMC was cheap that way. . . So, change my vote from 4 to 2.
__________________
89 Grand Wagoneer, 360, 727, 229, D44s, 2.5" Rancho lift, 31x10.5 mud tires, Howell TBI on an Edelbrock intake, MSD TFI upgrade, Engle cam, Edelbrock shorty headers, Single 2.5" exhaust with 40-series Flowmaster, Milodon high-flow water pump, BJs Offroad aluminum cross-flow radiator.
Current Jeep Status: She's alive!!
|

04-30-2007, 11:36 AM
|
 |
Bleedin' Gasoline
|
|
Join Date: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Cordenons, Italy / Springfield, VT
Posts: 1,997
|
|
|
Change your vote from 4 to 2, got it. Someone told me that at WOT a Howell TBI can exceed the CFM of a stock 2 bbl. Is this wrong?
__________________
Corey
Wagless for now
Last edited by aerocorey : 04-30-2007 at 12:04 PM.
|

04-30-2007, 12:33 PM
|
 |
Grease Monkey
|
|
Join Date: Nov 23, 2003
Location: Delhi, CA
Posts: 397
|
|
|
Uh, I can't find it. Anybody out there have the flow specs for the 2 barrel intake?
__________________
89 Grand Wagoneer, 360, 727, 229, D44s, 2.5" Rancho lift, 31x10.5 mud tires, Howell TBI on an Edelbrock intake, MSD TFI upgrade, Engle cam, Edelbrock shorty headers, Single 2.5" exhaust with 40-series Flowmaster, Milodon high-flow water pump, BJs Offroad aluminum cross-flow radiator.
Current Jeep Status: She's alive!!
|

04-30-2007, 12:45 PM
|
 |
Master Mechanic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 13, 2004
Location: Marshfield, WI
Posts: 1,002
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aerocorey
Do you guys really think a 4 bbl intake complicates things? Wouldn't you think it would be more troublesome to get it running right with a 2 bbl and then get it to run right with a 4 bbl? Isn't that like doing the entire job 2 times? I always ask my Airmen if they don't have time to do something right does that mean they have time to do it twice?
|
The question isn't really "why do the job twice" it is a question of "why do it at all?"
The critical fact that seems missing is a definitive determination that you gain more HP with a javelin non-egr 4bbl manifold versus the stock 2 bbl manifold with EGR.
TBI is about getting a system that is superior in driveability without the flaws of a carb. If you are after horsepower gains, you'd likely be better off putting a 4bbl carb on top of that 4bbl manifold.
__________________
79 Cherokee S
|

04-30-2007, 01:19 PM
|
 |
FSJ Maniac
|
|
Join Date: Oct 06, 2005
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 2,515
|
|
MPFI. 
__________________
'05 Chevy Silverado CC Duramax - The DD.
'73 Jeep J2000 - On the perpetual backburner.
Texas A&M Offroad
|

04-30-2007, 06:22 PM
|
 |
FSJ Maniac
|
|
Join Date: Nov 17, 2001
Location: Crestview FLORIDA
Posts: 3,438
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rmorit01
The question isn't really "why do the job twice" it is a question of "why do it at all?"
The critical fact that seems missing is a definitive determination that you gain more HP with a javelin non-egr 4bbl manifold versus the stock 2 bbl manifold with EGR.
TBI is about getting a system that is superior in driveability without the flaws of a carb. If you are after horsepower gains, you'd likely be better off putting a 4bbl carb on top of that 4bbl manifold.
|
yea man, what he said. 
__________________
Jeff - 74 Cherokee S 401/400/QT - basically stock 
ASE Master Auto Technician and full time auto enthusiast
|

04-30-2007, 07:11 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 10, 2003
Location: Back in Mountainair NM
Posts: 19,824
|
|
|
Propane!
|

04-30-2007, 08:40 PM
|
 |
Bleedin' Gasoline
|
|
Join Date: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Cordenons, Italy / Springfield, VT
Posts: 1,997
|
|
|
The EGR isn't the point. The 4 bbl is the point. The EGR is a side note. I'm not looking for any performance gain/loss/difference, gas mileage gain/loss/difference, or emissions gain/loss/difference by eliminating EGR. It's just that the 4 bbl intake I have doesn't have EGR.
I had been told that a 2 bbl intake would be restrictive to a Howell TBI at WOT. Anyhow have the straight poop on that fact? I'm looking for driveability like rmorit01 said, but if I'm gonna install all this crap I want to install it with the components that will allow it to perform the best I can get it to perform. Would it be worth trying to get a 4 bbl throttle body or is that a waste of time on a stock 360?
__________________
Corey
Wagless for now
|

04-30-2007, 09:43 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 08, 2003
Location: Centennial, Colorado
Posts: 2,895
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aerocorey
Why do people keep mentioning weight savings/lack of weight savings with reference to an intake manifold on a FSJ? I hereby declare a ban on mentioning the weight of an intake manifold for the duration of this thread unless it's a reference to ease of installation.
|
Next time I do an intake R&R with a cast iron intake you can lift it in/out for me, k?
I remember messing up my neck pulling an iron intake out of a motor in the junkyard... never been the same since...
Meanwhile... just do ALL your homework on the TBI. Why not put together a little list of plusses and minuses of each option and convince yourself? Not sure how you can be happy with a decision you didn't make.
Michael
__________________
KØFSJ - 1986 Grand Wagoneer "Troubled Child" - tc.wagoneer.org - on facebook
Stock 360, 3" w/ Magnaflow, 727 with TransGo, NP208, 4" Skyjacker, 33" BFG MT, WT Axles, Lock Right & ARB, OBA
Jeep Status: Down for TBI Install
|

04-30-2007, 09:47 PM
|
 |
Bleedin' Gasoline
|
|
Join Date: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Cordenons, Italy / Springfield, VT
Posts: 1,997
|
|
Like I said, unless you're talking about ease of installation. If I do it I think I'll take the hood off. I'm not looking forward to it. Wanna fly out and help me?
What is the flow rate of a stock 2 bbl intake vs. a stock 4 bbl intake?
__________________
Corey
Wagless for now
|

05-01-2007, 12:45 AM
|
|
Grease Monkey
|
|
Join Date: Nov 11, 2006
Location: The PNW
Posts: 304
|
|
If the 4 barrel intake is a spread bore then go with it.
The bore spacing of the TBI matches up better over the rear holes then on the squarebore or 2 barrel.
The bore dia of the TBI is 1 11/16. So measure the 2 barrel bore.
Keep in mind that the adapter will need to taper the bore in to match the stock intake on the 2 barrel.
Given the low rpm nature of the motor I doubt the 2 barrel intake would be a limiting factor.
You keep saying you want to improve driveability, well that all happens below 3000rpm.
Now if what you really mean is want want everything...HP and MPG.. then you need to decide what is the ultimate goal.
If you are going to start adding headers and maybe a cam later then just go with the 4 barrel now.
Choose the right adapter for the manifold.
Speadbore over the rear.(Have to adjust linkage.) Squarebore over the center, better if it open in the middle.
2 barrel you should get a good adapter. Holley used to sell a 17-45 IIRC that was tapered in. Now they are all just a flat plate and leave a ledge under the TB.
You argue in support of the 4 barrel so just install it and be done. If not you will second guess it everyday.
If you are retaining the OBA then tie the clutch wire to the AC sense wire and have them add 500rpm to the AC on idle speed.
BTW, I still run a 2 barrel on my motors!!
Here is the 2" 454 gasket on the 2 barrel manifold.
I make the adapter with the bore size i want to run based on the TB size.
Then I mount it on the manifold to use as a guide.
I then use a bimetal hole saw to enlarge the manifold.
Then I smooth everything out.

Then paint as needed.

__________________
Bill USN-1
Fuel Injection Moderator at BinderPlanet
Hamilton Fuel Injection
75 scout XLC 345/727/JPD300/3.73's/33's/4wdisc/hydroboost/EFI/OBA/OBW
1977 Innocenti 1001 (Italian Mini)EFI 1275/DIS
Last edited by Bill USN-1 : 05-01-2007 at 06:42 AM.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 PM.
|