 |
|

09-16-2003, 09:25 AM
|
|
FSJ Maniac
|
|
Join Date: Jul 28, 2002
Location: San Leandro, Ca
Posts: 2,949
|
|
I have been trying to look on the web for info on these but all i can find is them for sale. Anyone have info on which is better and why RJ44 recommended a Reverse instead of a standard in an earlier post. Thanks!
[ September 16, 2003, 04:00 PM: Message edited by: SLOwag ]
__________________
All It Takes Is Money.
I'm the reason why you can only have Jeeps for Avatars. You're welcome.
|

09-16-2003, 09:36 AM
|
 |
The Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 15, 2001
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 4,368
|
|
Hey man I've only got a second to respond so I'll have get back to you on this in detail later tonight. But for now I'll give you the short and sweet. A reverse manual valve body will make your auto act extremely similarly to a manual while retaining the good characteristics of an automatic. They kinda suck for daily drivers though.
-Andrew
__________________
Buggy Buildup
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by welchct
There are about 5 trails that actualy have section that are upwards of 85* and climb 40-50 feet at this deg.
|
"The combination of fine split tail and fine whiskey will make any man lose focus." -FSJeeper
|

09-16-2003, 09:43 AM
|
 |
Administrator <-- I'm Unfair
|
|
Join Date: Apr 09, 2000
Location: 53192
Posts: 3,736
|
|
shift when you want. my brother-in-law has one on his Dodge 440...swears by it. It looks neat.....responds well......and your left foot doesn't get as much of a workout.
But you still have a torque convertor.
__________________
_LRRH_
64 J300 | 70 Wag (RIP) | 00 Chero
|

09-16-2003, 09:59 AM
|
|
FSJ Maniac
|
|
Join Date: Jul 28, 2002
Location: San Leandro, Ca
Posts: 2,949
|
|
I should restate my question while i was searching i found a Reverse Manual Valve Body and a Standard/Forward Manual Valve Body. I wasn't quite clear on the difference except the $50 difference. Does the reverse change the order of the shifts? Just not really sure. Yeah they would suck for a DD just as much as a Manual would I would assume? I am just doing some reading and was wondering thanks for the quick replies guys!
__________________
All It Takes Is Money.
I'm the reason why you can only have Jeeps for Avatars. You're welcome.
|

09-16-2003, 10:49 AM
|
 |
Grease Monkey
|
|
Join Date: Jul 23, 2002
Location: Harford County, MD
Posts: 379
|
|
Yes,
Reverse manual valve body changes the shift pattern to
Park
Reverse
Neutral
First
Second
Third
You MUST shift manually all the time and will have no kickdown function. depending on your motor and torque convertor you can have VERY FIRM shifts even at part throttle. I have run several cars with reverse manual valve bodies, they are great for racing but I found that always chirping the tires with every shift isn't what I wanted on the street. Plus, if I wanted to shift every time myself I would get a four speed ( I eventually did)
[ September 16, 2003, 04:50 PM: Message edited by: rustywag ]
__________________
99 Grand Cherokee 4.7 2" lift 32" BFG M/T's "everything works and it gets good mileage" - But its Not an FSJ
97 Ram 1500 4X4
78 CJ7 258 Clifford cam, intake, Holley 390 4.0 Head/T-176/D-300 4" superlift & 33's
01 Tahoe for the Wife
79 Dodge Lil Red Express
|

09-16-2003, 01:33 PM
|
|
FSJ Maniac
|
|
Join Date: Jul 28, 2002
Location: San Leandro, Ca
Posts: 2,949
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by rustywag:
Yes,
Reverse manual valve body changes the shift pattern to
Park
Reverse
Neutral
First
Second
Third
|
Ten-4.. Okay thanks for the clearification. I think I like that shift pattern better if I was manually shifting then if it was the Standard style.
About the barking I doubt I could bark the tires on each shift but I have read about people jumping in their cars and starting them up and not waiting for the RPM's to kick down once the car is warmed up and pealing out and just not being ready for the SUDDEN kick. Thanks again. I am just doing a little research for the future of my rig. [img]smile.gif[/img] 
__________________
All It Takes Is Money.
I'm the reason why you can only have Jeeps for Avatars. You're welcome.
|

09-16-2003, 06:13 PM
|
 |
The Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 15, 2001
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 4,368
|
|
rustywag nailed it. They are cool for offroad because you can pick the gear and no matter what RPM you hit it will stay in that gear. Also they provide more compression braking I've heard. Can't comfirm that though. Also the reverse pattern facilitates itself to manual shifting instead of having D,2,1 it's 1,2,3.
__________________
Buggy Buildup
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by welchct
There are about 5 trails that actualy have section that are upwards of 85* and climb 40-50 feet at this deg.
|
"The combination of fine split tail and fine whiskey will make any man lose focus." -FSJeeper
|

09-17-2003, 02:47 AM
|
|
Master Mechanic
|
|
Join Date: Apr 29, 2001
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,046
|
|
not sure about the compression braking... i think TCI makes different versions...
drag racers are all about reducing drag, and don't want compression braking, so I think some kits will be worse as far as compression braking is concerned... just hearsay though.. i really know nothing...
__________________
1972 Wagoneer 360/th400/dana20/10b/14b/35\'s... welded diffs, full hydro and so on..
|

09-17-2003, 03:21 AM
|
|
FSJ Maniac
|
|
Join Date: Jul 28, 2002
Location: San Leandro, Ca
Posts: 2,949
|
|
From what i have read a lot DON'T have compression braking but some kits do.. But the Compression braking would be very much needed...
__________________
All It Takes Is Money.
I'm the reason why you can only have Jeeps for Avatars. You're welcome.
|

09-17-2003, 05:26 AM
|
 |
Grease Monkey
|
|
Join Date: Jul 23, 2002
Location: Harford County, MD
Posts: 379
|
|
Yes, I would say they offer improved compression braking. One issue I had with the rev pattern with my race cars was that at the end of a pass I couldn't shift into Neutral but instead had to go down thru 2nd and 1st. I didn't like imposing that deceleration stress on my driveline, but I also never broke anything so I guess it wasn't that bad. However, I say again that having to make every shift up or down all the time gets annoying.
__________________
99 Grand Cherokee 4.7 2" lift 32" BFG M/T's "everything works and it gets good mileage" - But its Not an FSJ
97 Ram 1500 4X4
78 CJ7 258 Clifford cam, intake, Holley 390 4.0 Head/T-176/D-300 4" superlift & 33's
01 Tahoe for the Wife
79 Dodge Lil Red Express
|

09-17-2003, 05:36 AM
|
|
FSJ Maniac
|
|
Join Date: Jul 28, 2002
Location: San Leandro, Ca
Posts: 2,949
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by rustywag:
Yes, I would say they offer improved compression braking. One issue I had with the rev pattern with my race cars was that at the end of a pass I couldn't shift into Neutral but instead had to go down thru 2nd and 1st. I didn't like imposing that deceleration stress on my driveline, but I also never broke anything so I guess it wasn't that bad. However, I say again that having to make every shift up or down all the time gets annoying.
|
Do you happen to remember what brand you used? i have seen a few people using a brand called Cheetah.. heard anything about it?
[ September 17, 2003, 11:36 AM: Message edited by: SLOwag ]
__________________
All It Takes Is Money.
I'm the reason why you can only have Jeeps for Avatars. You're welcome.
|

09-17-2003, 12:53 PM
|
 |
Auto Trannie God
|
|
Join Date: Feb 18, 2001
Location: Bouse,az
Posts: 10,424
|
|
if you get a shift kit that offers stage 3 it will be a man valve body mod
__________________
I\'ve seen gsmikie\'s video for the TH400 and thought it was just awful.watching a guy tear down a greasy pile of metal in a junkyard. it dosent have to be surrounded by water to be an island
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 AM.
|