<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Panoscopic:
It is hard to believe this model lasted for 28 years, especially past 1980 when gas prices were at a record high, and people were standing at long lines at the pump and there were many, more sensible alternatives.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
It was a tried and true design that worked for what it was intended to do. Folks that bought these when they were new had money and didn't care what gas costs...they could afford it. It was targeted for a small market nit for everyone. Yup it was targeted to the rich older crowd just as a Porche is targeted to the younger rich crowd. These weren't planned to be sold to young poor college kids living on Top Ramen noodles.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
I have every document that associated with the car since it was delivered new, and two-inch thick pile of maintenance documents for the typical Wag maladies – rear window inoperative, leaking power steering pump, windows not working, rough idle, well, you know the drill. Seemed typical of what you would expect of AMC at that time, or any other car manufacturer ready to go bankrupt.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Just because it's been to the dealer a lot doesn't mean it's been well maintained. Dealers thrive off repair work and will keep the process going as long as possible. So far as the rear windows, electric stuff goes that's not an AMC thing but a luxo cruiser thing. Any car that has a lot of power stuff will have power stuff fail. I've owned two Blazers and had the same prob with the rear window. It's inherent to the design where the window/gate is bathed in road dirt all the time.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
I remember when I borrowed the Wag for a weekend when it was new. I could not help but think that I could rent a compact car and the gas savings would pay for it versus driving the Wag.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Again this vehicle wasn't targeted to people who need to borrow cars...
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
Think of the price of these cars. The original sticker in 1986 was $23,465. But that price, who would put up with such poor quality? For that kind of money, you could drive a Mercedes Benz, Land Rover, or a Toyota Land Cruiser or two Chevy Suburbans.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I doubt the cost of living has doubled in 15 years but even so you ever price a decked out luxo 4x4 Suburban or a Range Rover?
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
I was a person who was always attracted to German and Japanese sports sedans and always had these cars tuned to perfection.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Your not exatly in the target market. You like fine tuned street cars. Nothing wrong with that at all but it would be like me whos loves to go hunting and buying a Honda Prelude?
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
The horrendous fuel economy and regular repairs that occupied my every weekend were just too much for me
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You take "any" 5000 lb 4WD vehicle and compare the fuel mileage to a Wags. A loaded 4x4 Suburban, full size truck etc and they won't get any better. It take fuel to move this much weigh with this many gear boxes.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
The younger people just snicker as they blast past in their tuned Honda Civics.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Keeping in mind the intended market...I'll bet the Civic folks quite snickering when the Wag turned off on a rutted muddy dirt road leading to the owners summer cabin. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
I’ve now replaced Panoscopic with a new 2001 TJ as my daily driver. Yes, TJ is a crude road car too, but with modern build quality and engine control systems, it is a world of difference. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>You've now got a car that has even more electro wizardry(wait till the dash shorts out), weighs 2/3 less, less room, less comfort etc and you gaind what 3-4 mpgs and car patments?
Not knocking your TJ at all but they too have their glitches and they can be expensive glitches.
Bottom line is FSJ's were built for a certain market and obviously you aren't in that market nor was I when these were built. Actually I'm still not in that market group that's why I run the earlier rigs that are more utility oriented rather than focusing on luxury. I don't like fixing all that elecro stuff either [img]smile.gif[/img]
It is hard to believe this model lasted for 28 years, especially past 1980 when gas prices were at a record high, and people were standing at long lines at the pump and there were many, more sensible alternatives.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
It was a tried and true design that worked for what it was intended to do. Folks that bought these when they were new had money and didn't care what gas costs...they could afford it. It was targeted for a small market nit for everyone. Yup it was targeted to the rich older crowd just as a Porche is targeted to the younger rich crowd. These weren't planned to be sold to young poor college kids living on Top Ramen noodles.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
I have every document that associated with the car since it was delivered new, and two-inch thick pile of maintenance documents for the typical Wag maladies – rear window inoperative, leaking power steering pump, windows not working, rough idle, well, you know the drill. Seemed typical of what you would expect of AMC at that time, or any other car manufacturer ready to go bankrupt.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Just because it's been to the dealer a lot doesn't mean it's been well maintained. Dealers thrive off repair work and will keep the process going as long as possible. So far as the rear windows, electric stuff goes that's not an AMC thing but a luxo cruiser thing. Any car that has a lot of power stuff will have power stuff fail. I've owned two Blazers and had the same prob with the rear window. It's inherent to the design where the window/gate is bathed in road dirt all the time.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
I remember when I borrowed the Wag for a weekend when it was new. I could not help but think that I could rent a compact car and the gas savings would pay for it versus driving the Wag.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Again this vehicle wasn't targeted to people who need to borrow cars...
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
Think of the price of these cars. The original sticker in 1986 was $23,465. But that price, who would put up with such poor quality? For that kind of money, you could drive a Mercedes Benz, Land Rover, or a Toyota Land Cruiser or two Chevy Suburbans.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I doubt the cost of living has doubled in 15 years but even so you ever price a decked out luxo 4x4 Suburban or a Range Rover?
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
I was a person who was always attracted to German and Japanese sports sedans and always had these cars tuned to perfection.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Your not exatly in the target market. You like fine tuned street cars. Nothing wrong with that at all but it would be like me whos loves to go hunting and buying a Honda Prelude?
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
The horrendous fuel economy and regular repairs that occupied my every weekend were just too much for me
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You take "any" 5000 lb 4WD vehicle and compare the fuel mileage to a Wags. A loaded 4x4 Suburban, full size truck etc and they won't get any better. It take fuel to move this much weigh with this many gear boxes.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
The younger people just snicker as they blast past in their tuned Honda Civics.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Keeping in mind the intended market...I'll bet the Civic folks quite snickering when the Wag turned off on a rutted muddy dirt road leading to the owners summer cabin. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
I’ve now replaced Panoscopic with a new 2001 TJ as my daily driver. Yes, TJ is a crude road car too, but with modern build quality and engine control systems, it is a world of difference. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>You've now got a car that has even more electro wizardry(wait till the dash shorts out), weighs 2/3 less, less room, less comfort etc and you gaind what 3-4 mpgs and car patments?
Not knocking your TJ at all but they too have their glitches and they can be expensive glitches.
Bottom line is FSJ's were built for a certain market and obviously you aren't in that market nor was I when these were built. Actually I'm still not in that market group that's why I run the earlier rigs that are more utility oriented rather than focusing on luxury. I don't like fixing all that elecro stuff either [img]smile.gif[/img]
Comment