Fuel economy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • '89_Wagon
    232 I6
    • Jan 01, 2019
    • 149

    #31
    Do those OEM spoilers do anything for gas mileage?

    '89 Grand Wagoneer
    AW4 Swap

    Comment

    • sierrablue
      327 Rambler
      • Jan 24, 2022
      • 522

      #32
      Originally posted by '89_Wagon
      Do those OEM spoilers do anything for gas mileage?

      Nothing for mileage (sticks up into the wind which adds drag). But hey, you won't suck exhaust into the rear window with it.
      DD:
      '71 Wagoneer
      B350/TH400/D20
      open knuckle D44 front
      http://www.ifsja.org/forums/vb/showt...79#post1734879

      Project:
      December 1962 Panel Delivery 4x4, Stock
      Pulled out of the woods in July 2023--hey, it rolls now https://forums.ifsja.org/core/images/smilies/tongue.png
      https://forums.ifsja.org/forum/tire-...29#post2476527

      Previous Rig:
      Tan '88 Grand Wagoneer
      .060 over 401, TBI, headers
      http://www.ifsja.org/forums/vb/showt...77#post1734777

      Comment

      • devildog80
        327 Rambler
        • Apr 13, 2022
        • 699

        #33
        It forces air down the back of your rig, yes to keep exhaust fumes from swirling in behind you, keeps the back of your truck a bit cleaner and cuts the drag a little.
        So multi purpose function for aerodynamics of the bricks' backside
        '81 CJ5 Base, 258 I6, MC2100, T176 4 spd, 300 TC, D30 Front NT, 3.31, 2-Piece AMC 20 rear NT, 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

        '84 Grand Wagoneer, 401 V8 (.030 over), MC2150 HA Comp, 727 auto, Selec-trac NP229, AMC 20 REAR - D44 FRONT - WT 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

        Rather be driving, than waiting to be modified

        Comment

        • backroadin'
          350 Buick
          • Aug 11, 2004
          • 1134

          #34
          Originally posted by FSJunkie

          How much gas can you buy with the amount of money that it would take to modify the Jeep for better fuel economy? It would only be marginally better fuel economy at that.
          Well said - actually that whole post was spot on.
          1973 Wagoneer, 4.6L Jeep inline 6 stroker, t176/d300, offy dualport w/ quadrajet, pertronix, flowmaster

          "Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads." -- Doc Brown

          "When this baby reaches 88 miles per hour, you're gonna to see some serious sht!"

          Comment

          • Brynjminjones
            258 I6
            • Jun 11, 2017
            • 475

            #35
            To add my 2 cents - the best thing for MPG I did on my 1991 Grand Wagoneer was reinstating some of the factory vacuum junk. I spent a long time tuning the carb, plus sorting out the EGR.

            With my rebuilt 360 bored .030" over, I get around 12 MPG driving hard on twisty, hilly roads.

            Lots of short journeys around town obviously lowers this (to around 10 MPG), but equally I can get up to 14-15 MPG on a long trip, varying between 65-75mph.

            I never expected to be able to beat the EPA estimates so easily, but the thing runs great!
            The best part is that this was all free, except my time.
            1991 Grand Wagoneer - Hunter Green. All stock. Rebuilt 360, .030" over with Melling MTA-1 cam.

            1998 Cherokee (XJ) 4.0
            1997 Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 4.0
            1974 Ford F100 390

            Comment

            • devildog80
              327 Rambler
              • Apr 13, 2022
              • 699

              #36
              That is what loving our FSJ's is all about

              Originally posted by Brynjminjones
              To add my 2 cents - the best thing for MPG I did on my 1991 Grand Wagoneer was reinstating some of the factory vacuum junk. I spent a long time tuning the carb, plus sorting out the EGR.

              With my rebuilt 360 bored .030" over, I get around 12 MPG driving hard on twisty, hilly roads.

              Lots of short journeys around town obviously lowers this (to around 10 MPG), but equally I can get up to 14-15 MPG on a long trip, varying between 65-75mph.

              I never expected to be able to beat the EPA estimates so easily, but the thing runs great!
              The best part is that this was all free, except my time.
              '81 CJ5 Base, 258 I6, MC2100, T176 4 spd, 300 TC, D30 Front NT, 3.31, 2-Piece AMC 20 rear NT, 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

              '84 Grand Wagoneer, 401 V8 (.030 over), MC2150 HA Comp, 727 auto, Selec-trac NP229, AMC 20 REAR - D44 FRONT - WT 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

              Rather be driving, than waiting to be modified

              Comment

              • conehead
                232 I6
                • Apr 24, 2006
                • 230

                #37
                Don't mean to brag but my 1987 Grand Wagoneer is getting 16-20 mpg at 65-70 mph but I have made some changes. 360 with Howell Fuel injection, NV 4500 5-speed and front axle locking hubs.
                Last edited by conehead; 05-20-2022, 04:05 PM.

                Comment

                • devildog80
                  327 Rambler
                  • Apr 13, 2022
                  • 699

                  #38
                  Nice setup
                  '81 CJ5 Base, 258 I6, MC2100, T176 4 spd, 300 TC, D30 Front NT, 3.31, 2-Piece AMC 20 rear NT, 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

                  '84 Grand Wagoneer, 401 V8 (.030 over), MC2150 HA Comp, 727 auto, Selec-trac NP229, AMC 20 REAR - D44 FRONT - WT 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

                  Rather be driving, than waiting to be modified

                  Comment

                  • Mikel
                    • Aug 09, 2000
                    • 6330

                    #39
                    I put an O2 sensor in my 1966 Oldsmobile so I could tune the carb more accurately. I played with the power piston spring in my quadrajet and now it runs leaner at light throttle (15-15.5:1 cruising) and gets richer quickly under heavier throttle. I went from 11MPG highway to 14 MPG.

                    I was going to get an EFI unit, but I'm having second thoughts. In the end, it's very difficult for a carburetor to leave you stranded. Money very well spent on the O2 sensor.
                    Last edited by Mikel; 05-23-2022, 07:16 AM.
                    1969 M715 6x6
                    1963 J300 Swivel frame

                    Comment

                    • devildog80
                      327 Rambler
                      • Apr 13, 2022
                      • 699

                      #40
                      Agree with you 100%

                      And EFI will rarely improve MPG, only lets your old vehicle respond like a newer one, to turn key and go. No more warm up time for choke etc, and then "where do I put the computer screen" becomes an issue!

                      I'm carbing with you
                      '81 CJ5 Base, 258 I6, MC2100, T176 4 spd, 300 TC, D30 Front NT, 3.31, 2-Piece AMC 20 rear NT, 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

                      '84 Grand Wagoneer, 401 V8 (.030 over), MC2150 HA Comp, 727 auto, Selec-trac NP229, AMC 20 REAR - D44 FRONT - WT 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

                      Rather be driving, than waiting to be modified

                      Comment

                      • Brynjminjones
                        258 I6
                        • Jun 11, 2017
                        • 475

                        #41
                        Another carb lover here too! I know they're not "better", but I feel like it suits the character of the vehicle better.

                        I don't think I'd enjoy driving it so much if it wasn't so stubborn at times
                        1991 Grand Wagoneer - Hunter Green. All stock. Rebuilt 360, .030" over with Melling MTA-1 cam.

                        1998 Cherokee (XJ) 4.0
                        1997 Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 4.0
                        1974 Ford F100 390

                        Comment

                        • rang-a-stang
                          Administrator
                          • Oct 31, 2016
                          • 5505

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Brynjminjones
                          ...I don't think I'd enjoy driving it so much if it wasn't so stubborn at times
                          HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
                          Chuck McTruck 71 J4000
                          (Chuck McTruck Build Thread)
                          (8.1L swap questions - PerformanceTrucks.net Forums​)
                          79 Cherokee Chief (SOLD, goodbye old buddy)
                          (Cherokee Build Thread)
                          11 Nissan Pathfinder Silver Edition 4x4
                          09 Mazdaspeed3 Grand Touring
                          00 Baby Cherokee

                          Comment

                          • devildog80
                            327 Rambler
                            • Apr 13, 2022
                            • 699

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Brynjminjones
                            Another carb lover here too! I know they're not "better", but I feel like it suits the character of the vehicle better.

                            I don't think I'd enjoy driving it so much if it wasn't so stubborn at times
                            Just the "nature" of our beasts
                            '81 CJ5 Base, 258 I6, MC2100, T176 4 spd, 300 TC, D30 Front NT, 3.31, 2-Piece AMC 20 rear NT, 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

                            '84 Grand Wagoneer, 401 V8 (.030 over), MC2150 HA Comp, 727 auto, Selec-trac NP229, AMC 20 REAR - D44 FRONT - WT 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

                            Rather be driving, than waiting to be modified

                            Comment

                            • sierrablue
                              327 Rambler
                              • Jan 24, 2022
                              • 522

                              #44
                              Mostly I'm just too cheap for injection I wouldn't mind injection; the electronics don't care about sitting or the temp or anything. But here we are.

                              I am a little surprised that hooking up all of the emissions stuff helped mileage, but whatever works
                              DD:
                              '71 Wagoneer
                              B350/TH400/D20
                              open knuckle D44 front
                              http://www.ifsja.org/forums/vb/showt...79#post1734879

                              Project:
                              December 1962 Panel Delivery 4x4, Stock
                              Pulled out of the woods in July 2023--hey, it rolls now https://forums.ifsja.org/core/images/smilies/tongue.png
                              https://forums.ifsja.org/forum/tire-...29#post2476527

                              Previous Rig:
                              Tan '88 Grand Wagoneer
                              .060 over 401, TBI, headers
                              http://www.ifsja.org/forums/vb/showt...77#post1734777

                              Comment

                              • devildog80
                                327 Rambler
                                • Apr 13, 2022
                                • 699

                                #45
                                As designed they do not run too bad

                                Originally posted by sierrablue
                                Mostly I'm just too cheap for injection I wouldn't mind injection; the electronics don't care about sitting or the temp or anything. But here we are.

                                I am a little surprised that hooking up all of the emissions stuff helped mileage, but whatever works
                                '81 CJ5 Base, 258 I6, MC2100, T176 4 spd, 300 TC, D30 Front NT, 3.31, 2-Piece AMC 20 rear NT, 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

                                '84 Grand Wagoneer, 401 V8 (.030 over), MC2150 HA Comp, 727 auto, Selec-trac NP229, AMC 20 REAR - D44 FRONT - WT 3.31, 4" high arc spring lift

                                Rather be driving, than waiting to be modified

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X