PDA

View Full Version : Another Automatic Overdrive Option for an AMC V8


The PIG Smith
11-01-2007, 02:27 AM
Sorry, this is a long post, but has some good reading and great info.
Some may disagree that a AW4 is good for anything, but is here folks that think different.
You read nothing else, ask yourself this:
If a AW4 style trannsmission can stand up to a twin turbo Toyota Supra, then why shouldn't one work behind an AMC V8?

The text is cut and pasted from BullTear's Forum:
Read the original post here:
amc 360+aw4? (http://www.bulltear.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7530)

milnersXcoupe wrote:

" Specifics to mate an XJ a4w automatic to an amc360cu.in.V8.

just noodling --

it -should- all bolt together, including the flexplate. you'll need
to add an unbalance weight to the plate if the 360 isn't neutral
balanced. up to '95, aw4s have a separate tcm which iirc may need its
own tps but should be adaptable without too much aggro.

the converter probably isn't right for an engine 50% bigger. also,
the a340 from a toyota tundra - rated 325 ft-lbs - would be attractive
for internal parts at least, even if the converter/housing/flexplate
pattern turn out to be incompatible with the aw4.


Then milnersXcoupe wrote some more:

Handling a stock 360 ? Yes.

'Warmed' ? - use the a340 with the JEEP bellhousing - and the
stand alone '88-'89 TCM.

a340 aisin version is used behind the Toyota Supra and versions in Toyota Trucks.

"AW4 Transmission Torque Converter Lock Up Controller"

http://tinyurl.com/2mdv4p (http://tinyurl.com/2mdv4p)

Here's some more Info. I lifted by:
Dan Houlton
houlster@inficad.com (houlster@inficad.com)

Isuzu guru Dan Houlton at www.4x4wire.com (http://www.4x4wire.com/) has infomation regarding the swapping of bellhousings between Aisin automatic transmissions in Jeeps and Toyotas.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"A quick run-down.

The A340 is a very popular tranny in different variants. The key thing is that the main body is the same regardless of what manufacture is using it. Things like bell housings, torque converters, output shafts, tail housings and internal clutches, etc, are different depending on what it's in. *ALL* variances are handled in the bell and tail housing. i.e, something with a big, thick TC will account for that with a big, deep bell housing.

You can swap the bell housing that fits your motor, to an A340 from a different vehicle. This will let you physically bolt it up, but you'll need to account for electronics / TCM yourself. Hardware like the TCM and wiring harness may be very similar, or even the same between makes / models, but I'm unsure of that. The programming will certainly be vehicle specific though.

So...

A340H
This has a hydraulic t-case. Not sure what that means, but it is integral to the tranny. You need to pull the t-case apart to get to the bolts to remove it from the tranny.
This is what Isuzu used in the 2.6 Trooper. They called it the 30-80LE
Used by Toyota early on too.

A340E
2wd version of the A340. No t-case, just a 2wd tail housing. Probably different output shaft variants for different manufactures too.

A340F
Used specifically by Toyota I think starting around '94 or '95. This uses a mechanical, chain-drive t-case. If you want Marlin Crawlers, you can use this tranny, his parts/adapters, toy t-cases and whatever bell, TC, flexplate that will fit your motor.

Some are 21 spline outputs (early 4cyl maybe?). Most I think are 23 spline. If you've got parts already, this could be a good drivetrain. To buy all new though, for tranny (used) and a complete Marlin dual-tcase crawler setup with all the adapters need, the dual t-cases, 4.7's in one case, etc., you're looking at *at least* $2500. That's the main reason I didn't go this route, as I have *no* Toy parts starting out.

AW4
Jeep variant. Used a mechanical t-case, usually a NP-231. The tail housing is the common 6-bolt pattern though, so there's a ton of NP/NV t-cases that'll bolt up. Mine has a big sticker that says 30-40LE

It's also 21/23 spline. It seems the cutoff date is around '91. Before that, it was 21 or 23 depending on the engine. After that, they were all 23 spline.

These were used in a couple different models in different years I think. It's been the auto in nearly every Cherokee though. There's a ton of these out there and it's very cheap compared to a Toy A340F.

Note: According to Marlin, the Jeep 23 spline is *not* the same as the Toyota 23 spline. The shaft on the AW4 is about 1" - 1.5" longer than the Toy A340F, but I thought originally you could still use Marlin's adapters with an extra spacer. He says the shaft diameters are different though. Off by 30 thou or something. Spline pitch is probably different too.

AW4's also used 2 different OD ratios. Early ones were the typical .7:1 ratio. Again, don't know the cutoff, but by around '95 or so, all were using a shallower .75:1 OD. If you search the www.naxja.org (http://www.naxja.org/) forums for AW4, you'll find a ton of info on these.


Theres a bunch more too. The A343 was an upgraded A340. Can't remember specifics though on 2wd/4wd or vehicles. There is also a version behind some big, V8 luxo SUV that uses a much larger and deeper torque converter and a larger input shaft to account for it. That's the only variant that has a different input shaft that I can think of though.


So, in general, if your particular motor used one of these, you could obtain the bell housing, torque converter and flexplate for that motor/tranny combo, and bolt it to any other A340 variant. Use a Toy A340F to run Toy t-cases and Marlin crawlers. Use a Jeep AW4 for NV/NP t-cases, Klune-V's, Atlas II's, Dana 300, etc. "

--------------------

"Now, what's really cool about this (and is what pushed me over the edge finally) is the tidbit Jerry dropped that I mentioned earlier. The '03 or '04 Isuzu's now use the AW tranny again behind the 3.5. In doing so, they produced a new bellhousing to mate the two. This bell bolts to the 60 deg Chevy pattern in the 3.5 block. So, after my engine swap, I'll be able to get a bell housing from Isuzu that'll bolt this new drivetrain to my 4.9 Caddy motor. Will need to figure out a torque converter / flexplate for it, but that's a pretty minor issue I think.

This also means that it'll bolt to several engines (Isuzu 3.2/3.5, GM 2.8/3.1/3.4, Isuzu 2.3/2.6, Caddy V8's including the Northstar, the 3.5 Olds shortstar, GM supercharged 3800, multiple Toyota engines including the turbocharged Supra, the Tundra V8, and on and on), all with factory bell housings. These tranny's have a very good reputation for being strong and reliable. But, with big V8 power, a stock tranny may not last long and will need a HD re-build on it. Built this way, it does last behind 600 hp Supra's, and heavy, TRD supercharged 4-Runner/Tacoma/Tundra/Sequoia trucks as well. "


Last milnersXcoupe posted this link from Pirate
401 in a MJ (http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=360797&highlight=401+in+a+MJ)

The PIG Smith
11-01-2007, 03:12 AM
According to Novak, the AW4 is not very desirable:
The Novak Guide to the Aisin-Warner AW4 Transmission (http://www.novak-adapt.com/knowledge/aw4.htm)

So, what to believe?
Professionals say it's junk.
Individuals that have it installed say they work well.

The PIG Smith
11-01-2007, 03:19 AM
More good information about the Toyota A340 (same as the Jeep AW4)

A340 Transmission issues and FAQs (http://www.toyotaholics.com/support/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=19)

Ristow
11-01-2007, 05:05 AM
i'd use an A500 before an AW4. put good clutches in it. it'd probably do fine behind a 360 if it wasn't abused.

cincyjeeprs
11-01-2007, 07:35 PM
Well, let me think. I have had 4 XJs with the AW4. One got traded in early, but the other 3 have/had 165,000, 195,000 and 205,000 miles on them without a single problem. I still have 2 of them running strong. Will they hold up to a stock V8? I dunno, but on baby Cherokees, they are gold. Novak likes Chebbies a little too much.

Rainman
11-01-2007, 11:49 PM
i'd use an A500 before an AW4. put good clutches in it. it'd probably do fine behind a 360 if it wasn't abused.

not all of us have an a500 with an amc bellhousing:rolleyes:

KaiserMan
11-02-2007, 07:15 AM
I think the wieght of a FSJ would have an effect on the AW4. I doubt it would last long in my 5,000lb Gladiator.

olllllo
11-02-2007, 07:25 AM
One of the main reasons that I just bought my first FSJ is because of the AW4 in my XJ. It is *awesome* for that application. However, it overheated so easily. Just pulling my pop-up camper, the tranny got hot enough that it burped out some tranny fluid and in the process created a leak in its front seal. Granted, I didn't have a tranny cooler on it, which I imagine would have made a difference, but it doesn't seem like there is a very big margin of error there.

Ristow
11-02-2007, 10:47 AM
not all of us have an a500 with an amc bellhousing:rolleyes:



:huh: readily available,came in the 90s' grand cherokees' behind the AMC 4.0....:rolleyes:

Wagonforever
11-02-2007, 09:31 PM
Where those early A500 and 518's computer controlled?

SCscoutguy
11-02-2007, 09:51 PM
not all of us have an a500 with an amc bellhousing:rolleyes: Uh they made a ton of them in the 90's.
Edit: I see Ristow already beat me to it.

Ristow
11-03-2007, 12:11 AM
Where those early A500 and 518's computer controlled?

yes,but the RH models were not shifted via a computer program.the computer simply controlled the o/d and lock-up functions. on an RH model those functions can be controlled with a couple pressure and vacuum switches if used on an older vehicle.

Wagonforever
11-03-2007, 11:17 PM
yes,but the RH models were not shifted via a computer program.the computer simply controlled the o/d and lock-up functions. on an RH model those functions can be controlled with a couple pressure and vacuum switches if used on an older vehicle.


What's an RH model?

I was looking at a 518 out of a 92 RAM that my buddy has today. I put it up next to my extra 727 and they look almost identical. The only real differance is there's a 4 pin electrical conector at the very left rear, just before the O/D unit. I'm assuming the those 4 pins control the O/D and lock up converter. It even has all the same shift linkages.

Ristow
11-04-2007, 06:01 AM
that would be an RH model.but are you sure it wasn't just 3 pins? the RE have 7 or 8 pins,and shift points are computer controlled on theose. the RH models 1-2-3 shift just like a 727,from valve body and TV calibration. yes,the 500/518 is derived from the 3 speed predecesors. the 518 is nearly all 727 parts in front of the o/d unit.

Wagonforever
11-04-2007, 07:32 AM
It could have been 3 pins. I was just doing a quick compairison, and wasn't as concerned with the electrical conection as to see if I could simply put a 518 O/D on the back of my 727. It looks like it'd bolt up, probably have to put a 518 out put shaft in the back of the 727 and then just wire up the O/D unit. Also do the 727's in the Grand's have a lock up converter?

Ristow
11-04-2007, 08:21 AM
sorry,but the o/d unit will not bolt onto the rear of a 727.substantial changes were done to the rear to accomodate the o/d unit.

i've not seen a locking converter in a grand yet,but they may be out there.