View Full Version : If you were to convert to diesel
getlost4x4
01-29-2010, 10:52 PM
What motor would you run. The wagoneer i bought has a 401 V8 in it. the motor only has 72K miles on it, but its been sitting since 1997.
but i would really like something with a bit better mileage. my 4.7 V8 gets 18-20 on the highway.
I can't afford a cummins:banghead: 6BT ($2K)
so i was thinking about a 5 cylinder Mercedes TD, but they are only rated for 125 hp and 200 ft/lbs torque, and i'd have to run a divorced Tcase behind the auto tranny since the adapters are $1000 to run a gm manual tranny. i don't know if thats enough power to push a waggy down the highway at 80 mph
i also looked at the 4BT but its still $2K around here
what other TD's are there to look for that are TD and would fit in a waggy?
Is anyone running a GM diesel? I've heard the 6.5 turbo isn't too bad. will the stock TH400 bolt up to that?
vintagetrks
01-29-2010, 10:54 PM
I would think the GM would be your best bet.
amcboy
01-29-2010, 11:09 PM
Money no object...
I'd have to go with a Caterpillar D17000 V-8.
It only makes 190HP, but it delivers 2800 Ft./Lbs.@750 RPM.
Torquey, not Dorky.
Too bad its 7000# and has a radiator about the same size as the hood of a J10.
But money being no object, I'm sure we can work through all of that.
;)
getlost4x4
01-29-2010, 11:10 PM
i don't think that would fit in the waggy
All dsl swaps are expensive period. The GM dsl's are good motors and prolly the cheapest to do by buying a complete donor truck. And No an AMC patterned TH400 from a FSJ will not bolt up to a 6.2/6.5 hence one reason to buy a complete truck rather than just a motor.
I agree the cumins is prolly/arguablely the best motor out of the common choices but that does not mean the others are bad dsl,s
Guess I wasn't here when the cumin's kool aide was passed around.
Use the search function here . The cumin's/GM/thing has been beat to death on this forum.
Cappicaper
01-29-2010, 11:52 PM
If you score the right Bread Van they run around $3000. You get a 4BT and Turbo 400 (It think). The you can sell the van for scrap (it's aluminum so the monehy is decent) and sell the wheels off of it to a truck dude - they are 19.5 on 8X6.5 bolt pattern. At least it off sets the up front cost a little.
AMC-J/20
01-30-2010, 05:29 AM
If you go with a 6.5 you will be sorry :thumbsup: . . .
a 6.2 is a much more reliable engine a 6.5 will break down a lot ;)
I know i own one, but if you do go with a 94' + 6.5 i can tell you how to fix all it's issue's, and make it a reliable unit.
But it still won't be powerful, your 401 will out pull it and out accelerate it 100 times over good luck !
The 6.2 reliable light on power but that can be fixed by simply turn the fuel screw 1/4 of a turn ;)
No your TH400 won't bolt up not even close, for a GM-Diesel you need a 4L80 or 4L80E, only 2 GM transmission's that will work behind the diesels.
:eek: 4L80 = Mistaken of TH700R4 :eek: I've done it myself :o
:D Cummins 3.9L I-4 or 5.9L I-6 :thumbsup: even the Izzy I-4 & I-6 's are powerful and there non -turbo NA-Diesels :D
that's the 4 choices i'd go with . . . GM diesels No good :cool:
Mike
I recently acquired an old wagoneer (60s...still trying to figure out year) from my uncle. I am going the 4bt route. The V8 hasn't ran for 15 years, so I am not too confident in getting that power plant going again.
I have just started my planning stage, but am going to see what options are out there for a manual trans as well.
shackwrrr
01-30-2010, 09:27 AM
Detroit 4-53. They sound awesome. I know their slow but I still like them. Put a turbo pushin through the scavenge pump and make 'er scream.
AMC-J/20
01-30-2010, 09:32 AM
:D Ya they do :thumbsup:
them 2stoke Detroit's rev like Industrial Gas engine's 3,200-3,500RPM . . .
Mike
No your TH400 won't bolt up not even close, for a GM-Diesel you need a 4L80 or 4L80E, only 2 GM transmission's that will work behind the diesels.
A GM TH 400 will work just fine My 83 C20 w/6.2 came with and still has the original TH400 behind it.
bigun
01-30-2010, 12:33 PM
Actually there are several adapters out there for the MB engine
one uses the AX 15 found behind late model jeeps if you get a 94 and up the slave is on the outside you can buy an clocking ring that will allow you to run the D300 transfer case!
Adapter
http://www.4btswaps.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10388
Clocking ring
http://www.novak-adapt.com/catalog/kit_153.htm
Diesel forums of interest
http://www.superturbodiesel.com/std/
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php
My plans are to put in a Mercedes turbo 4, AX15,D300 with 4.88 gears in the diGreat Googley MoogleyGreat Googley MoogleyGreat Googley Moogley with 31" tires in my 67 Commando. remember the MB engines like to live around 3,000 RPM the particular combo I have outlined should pull around 2,800 Rpm in 5th gear at 70 MPH and if they ain't lieing to me around 20+ MPG
Charlie, what model MB's used a turbo 4 cyl?
bigun
01-30-2010, 08:17 PM
Charlie, what model MB's used a turbo 4 cyl? None Hari has a 240 that needs a head gasket which he has offered for free! From my reading it is a 4 banger of course I could be wrong. Adding a turbo from what I have read isn't that difficult
None Hari has a 240 that needs a head gasket which he has offered for free! From my reading it is a 4 banger of course I could be wrong. Adding a turbo from what I have read isn't that difficult
Maybe adapted from a 5 cyl 300D? Glad ya didn't tell me a 90's era GLML series. Those are budget busters. The 240D/300D's are still in the mere mortal realm
PS, yeah the 240D's are 4 cyl.
bigun
01-30-2010, 09:04 PM
Maybe adapted from a 5 cyl 300D? Glad ya didn't tell me a 90's era GLML series. Those are budget busters. The 240D/300D's are still in the mere mortal realm
PS, yeah the 240D's are 4 cyl. Nope this is eventually going to be my towed behind the motor home/DD. Like I said I could be wrong on the adapting the turbo (I have spent hours reading on the MB sites and may have fogged it in) if I am then I'll have to tell Hari thanks an look for a 300D parts vehicle
mattmopar440
01-30-2010, 11:48 PM
Later model 4BT with a little mods produce same HP as a stock 401 and same or a little more TQ
Daddio
01-31-2010, 09:29 AM
I may be the only person who is not a fan of the 6.2/6.5 engines. I had an '89 3/4 4x4 suburban with a na 6.2L J(the "heavy duty" version). It was 12 years old with a little over 100k and in the span of 12 months it developed a hole in the top of a piston and then engine number 2 dropped a valve on the way to work one morning. The first engine wasn't rebuildable because all of the center main bearing supports had cracks, which I found out is a very common problem.
I wasn't ready to give up on the 6.2 so I spent some dollars on the second engine and replaced the timing chain with a gear drive kit. The 6.2 is one if not the only v8 truck diesel that uses a timing chain instead of a gear drive from the factory. It's significant because all chains get slack and the injection pump has to be exact or it just doesn't run right or have much power. The gear drive really did make a big difference but within 6 months it dropped a valve. The rather amazing part was the engine survived and the valve (a very large valve I might add) was smashed to bits. I fixed it and put it up for sale. I know it's still on the road because I see it every once in a while.
The 6.2 and 6.5 are essentially the same engine the same and most parts are interchangeable. Most 6.5's had turbos, but a few were n.a. and most 6.5's had an electronic injection pump unlike the mechanical ones on the 6.2. Many of the 6.5 problems were related to the electronic injection pump.
Some people have gone over 200K without any issues, but I'm not one of those people and I'm not alone. Search the internet and you'll find all kinds of major issues like broken crankshafts, cracked heads, dropped precombussion cups, on and on. There is a reason why they moved on to duramax.
710 Burner
01-31-2010, 10:58 AM
6.2/6.5 you need a Chevy patterned TH400. You have to put in the tailshaft from your AMC TH400 and use your exising T/C adapter. You can use a 700R4 or 4L60 non E overdrive trans with an adapter kit for the T/C if you want OD.
getlost4x4
01-31-2010, 07:38 PM
i think i just found a good diesel.
3.3L turbo diesel out of a 1980 scout II. 6 cylinder diesel built by nissan.
i think there is one at my friends junk yard. i'm going to check it out.
anyone interested in buying a 401 V8 drivetrain, TH400 and BW1339?
i'm going to swap everything over drivetrain wise from the scout to the waggy! i only have 4 months to do the complete swap.
jeepjseries
01-31-2010, 07:44 PM
Let us know how the swap goes. good luck.
dusty
02-01-2010, 09:40 AM
Go here http://www.ifsja.org/forums/vb/showthread.php?t=113929 it might help
Then for a little more info on the little nissan SD33T
check out http://www.binderplanet.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5
;)
For all the crap IH gets about doing things differently they pushed the cutting edge a few times integrating a turbo diesel into thier line while other manufacturers were just begining to look at adding NA diesels into thiers. the SD33T was ahead of its time and lacked the necessary torque in true IH fashion "underpower limit the warranty claims" fashion. a built 4bt or even a stock 4bt will out perform the SD33T but the SD33T will hold its own
Bill Moore
02-01-2010, 05:41 PM
Cumins 4 or 6bt is the only way to go. 6bt is better but a lot of extra work. Prices at the moment
Are way down for these with the 6.2 being given away for scap prices
shackwrrr
02-01-2010, 09:48 PM
the 240d mecedes deisel only makes 95hp and 100 or so ft lbs non turbo. My boss has a 1975 one that only make 75hp and 85tq
getlost4x4
02-01-2010, 10:21 PM
i found a sd33t, the engine is there, i'm just missing the rest of the drivetrain.
i think i could pump some more power out of that motor with some extra boost, bigger turbo, intercooler etc.
i'm going to see how much i can get out of the 401 in my jeep right now. i've just got to get the hood open and get it running.
Karl Streich
02-04-2010, 06:25 PM
SD33 is a great light engine, I'm installing a 6.2 as I tend to get them for free :D or close there too... I also considered a Perkens 354, I have an XJ to recieve an OM617, tuned up it'll do an FSJ just as well at the 140hp SMOGged out 360
reece146
02-04-2010, 09:11 PM
OM617 would be interesting. I think there is a company making an adapter for it for GM transmissions now.
bigun
02-04-2010, 09:24 PM
OM617 would be interesting. I think there is a company making an adapter for it for GM transmissions now.
the only one I have seen is for one of the overdrive autos at over a grand in price! From what I have read they have been advertising for a year but haven't shipped the first one yet
Towtruck
02-05-2010, 07:51 AM
Check out the Isuzu/GM engine in the NPR series light commercial trucks. Versions with power @ 135, 175, and 205 hp. Prices have dropped dramatically, availability is good, including parts. See JeepinPete's thread regarding his swap. No brainer, especially for 2wd.
AMC-J/20
02-05-2010, 08:32 AM
the 6.2L diesel makes 135hp@3,600rpm and the 6.5-T makes 190hp@3,400rpm, trust me if you plan on towing you'll need short tires n 4.10's or 4.56's & 4.88's . . .
Remember GM gears them to cruise 2,400-2,600rpm, so if you lug it down to 2,000-2,200 rpm it fall flat on its face towing heavy . . .
My 6.5-T is all factory geared and tired it run's 65mph@2,500rpm, it get really sluggish under a 4,500lb load.
i put 1,500lbs in the bed and hitch 3,000lbs behind it and my 6.5-T was very sluggish and doggy.
Towing 6,000lbs was crazy slow it wouldn't really pull for crap lots of 2nd gear hill climbs.
I can't imagine the 6.2L would be any better but it seem's to be more reliable the 94+ 6.5-T's have the electronic Injection pump aka drive by wire system they have boat loads of reliability issues . . .
94+ 6.5-T i recommend 4.10's with 32's n smaller tires for a driver / light towing i'd run 4.56's or 4.88's with 32-34" tires for a towing rig over sized tires of 35" + 5.13's :thumbsup:
A buddy of mine laughed at me but few months later is K2500 on 38's had set of 5.38's installed and he loves it ;)
Mike
AMC-J/20
02-05-2010, 08:36 AM
A GM TH 400 will work just fine My 83 C20 w/6.2 came with and still has the original TH400 behind it.
:D yup that's wonderful :thumbsup: but his AMC-TH400 will not bolt to the 6.2/6.5 diesel ;) . . .
Mike
Karl Streich
02-05-2010, 10:35 AM
OM617 would be interesting. I think there is a company making an adapter for it for GM transmissions now.
Yes, for a grand :eek: I could do the entire swap from pick-n-pull for less than their adapter, assuming I gotta buy 2 engines :p
Karl Streich
02-05-2010, 10:40 AM
:D yup that's wonderful :thumbsup: but his AMC-TH400 will not bolt to the 6.2/6.5 diesel ;) . . .
Mike
GM TH400s are a dime a dozen, just takes a little dirty work to get the output shaft on it :thumbsup:
Karl Streich
02-05-2010, 10:44 AM
Very true, but it's an economy engine, I have a duramax and a 6.9 for that kind of work, and plans to build an F350 with a DT360, My two cents? If you are towing with an old diesel it's gotta have a standard transmission with lotsa gears, I doubt I'll ever tow more than a ton or two with the Cherokee, mostly just drive it around.
the 6.2L diesel makes 135hp@3,600rpm and the 6.5-T makes 190hp@3,400rpm, trust me if you plan on towing you'll need short tires n 4.10's or 4.56's & 4.88's . . .
Remember GM gears them to cruise 2,400-2,600rpm, so if you lug it down to 2,000-2,200 rpm it fall flat on its face towing heavy . . .
My 6.5-T is all factory geared and tired it run's 65mph@2,500rpm, it get really sluggish under a 4,500lb load.
i put 1,500lbs in the bed and hitch 3,000lbs behind it and my 6.5-T was very sluggish and doggy.
Towing 6,000lbs was crazy slow it wouldn't really pull for crap lots of 2nd gear hill climbs.
I can't imagine the 6.2L would be any better but it seem's to be more reliable the 94+ 6.5-T's have the electronic Injection pump aka drive by wire system they have boat loads of reliability issues . . .
94+ 6.5-T i recommend 4.10's with 32's n smaller tires for a driver / light towing i'd run 4.56's or 4.88's with 32-34" tires for a towing rig over sized tires of 35" + 5.13's :thumbsup:
A buddy of mine laughed at me but few months later is K2500 on 38's had set of 5.38's installed and he loves it ;)
Mike
billyrb
02-05-2010, 03:01 PM
Go with a LB7 Duramax 6.6L. And no, I'm not biased due to the fact that I have one for sale that needs a head job & a new gasket ;)
billyrb
02-05-2010, 03:02 PM
wait a minute, yes I AM biased :)
OM617 would be interesting. I think there is a company making an adapter for it for GM transmissions now.
If you're talking about 4x4 Labs and they finally have it worked out please PM cause after years of constant emails all I ever get from them is "we're workin on it" :(
:D yup that's wonderful :thumbsup: but his AMC-TH400 will not bolt to the 6.2/6.5 diesel ;) . . .
Mike
Correct that's why I posted "GM" th400 and not AMC 400
AMC-J/20
02-06-2010, 01:03 PM
Pretty much any and all or rather Most of GM's transmissions will bolt to the 6.2/6.5's . . .
I just think swapping a 6.2/6.5 into some thing else is rather pointless, when other more powerful options can be had for less cost . . .
But i will you guy's that much I HATE the 6.5 lousy power piss poor reliability, but the one pro to it is they get 19mpg CTY & 21mpg HWY in K2500 with 4.10's . . .
3/4 ton 4 wheel drive with 4.10's = 19-21mpg :thumbsup: other that i simply hate them :banghead:
CON's:
1. break down often.
2. don't have much power.
3. cost a lot to fix.
4. Limited up grade ability.
PRO's:
1. Can be bought cheap.
2. Awesome fuel mileage.
Mike
scotty
02-07-2010, 05:03 PM
3/4 ton 4 wheel drive with 4.10's = 19-21mpg :thumbsup:
it was comments like this that originally got me into diesels. i see claims of 19 to 30 mpg out of diesel engies. :eek: my favorites are the guys that claim to get 20mpg while towing loaded trailers :rolleyes:
my experiences are very different. my 4wd C&C crewcab chevy with a heavy flatbed has a n/a 6.2/rebuilt 700r and 4.10 gears,and very short tires. it weighs about 7000 lbs.
back before the introduction of ULSD if i babied the crap out of it(read:out accelerated by kids on bikes ;) ) i could get about 18/19 mpg. since ULSD with the same ultra conservative driving style,it now gets 15/16.
believe it or not i have towed with it. pulled my scout to the trails a couple of times-75ish miles each way,stop/start thru towns and some good grades and i had my foot ont he floor 95% of the time. towing it got about 8mpg.
comparatively my 96 4wd dually ext cab dodge gets about the same mileage round town-15/16. best highway mielage was 23 with a pair of d70s in the bed,and kept the speed at 55. towing my 36 foot gooseneck with 2 jeeps on it to the same trails it gets 9/10. of course thats easily twice the load as the small bumperpull trailer with 1 rig on it. towing smaller trailers i get anywhere from 12-16 mpg depending onthe size,and the route.
my whole point here is that it takes a certain amount of power/energy to move a relatively unaerodynamic mass down the highway at whatever speeds.
i would not have high hopes for getting 20+ mpg in a FSJ with a small underpowered turbodiesel. even with bigger,more powerful TDs to get good mileage youll have to keep your foot out of it and your cruising speeds slow.
having said all that, i think the 4bt is the best choice for a FSJ thats purpose is mainly DD suties,and maybe some mild towing.
Mikel
02-07-2010, 05:08 PM
it was comments like this that originally got me into diesels. i see claims of 19 to 30 mpg out of diesel engies. :eek: my favorites are the guys that claim to get 20mpg while towing loaded trailers :rolleyes:
my experiences are very different. my 4wd C&C crewcab chevy with a heavy flatbed has a n/a 6.2/rebuilt 700r and 4.10 gears,and very short tires. it weighs about 7000 lbs.
back before the introduction of ULSD if i babied the crap out of it(read:out accelerated by kids on bikes ;) ) i could get about 18/19 mpg. since ULSD with the same ultra conservative driving style,it now gets 15/16.
believe it or not i have towed with it. pulled my scout to the trails a couple of times-75ish miles each way,stop/start thru towns and some good grades and i had my foot ont he floor 95% of the time. towing it got about 8mpg.
comparatively my 96 4wd dually ext cab dodge gets about the same mileage round town-15/16. best highway mielage was 23 with a pair of d70s in the bed,and kept the speed at 55. towing my 36 foot gooseneck with 2 jeeps on it to the same trails it gets 9/10. of course thats easily twice the load as the small bumperpull trailer with 1 rig on it. towing smaller trailers i get anywhere from 12-16 mpg depending onthe size,and the route.
my whole point here is that it takes a certain amount of power/energy to move a relatively unaerodynamic mass down the highway at whatever speeds.
i would not have high hopes for getting 20+ mpg in a FSJ with a small underpowered turbodiesel. even with bigger,more powerful TDs to get good mileage youll have to keep your foot out of it and your cruising speeds slow.
having said all that, i think the 4bt is the best choice for a FSJ thats purpose is mainly DD suties,and maybe some mild towing.
My 4BT-powered J300 consistently gets 23-25MPG on the highway with me driving like a maniac. Gearing is too tall to drive any slower :rolleyes: For a truck with Dana 60/70 axles and a NP200 T/C, I'm not complaining one bit.
I'm switching from 3.08's to 3.73's shortly. Gearing is fine for most of what I do, but I want to be able to do some towing. The engine puts an estimated 150HP and the truck feels faster than some 360 FSJ's that I've had.
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn223/bw1339/My%20J300/DSC03946.jpg
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn223/bw1339/My%20J300/DSC05291.jpg
AMC-J/20
02-07-2010, 06:06 PM
it was comments like this that originally got me into diesels. i see claims of 19 to 30 mpg out of diesel engies. :eek: my favorites are the guys that claim to get 20mpg while towing loaded trailers :rolleyes:
my experiences are very different. my 4wd C&C crewcab chevy with a heavy flatbed has a n/a 6.2/rebuilt 700r and 4.10 gears,and very short tires. it weighs about 7000 lbs.
back before the introduction of ULSD if i babied the crap out of it(read:out accelerated by kids on bikes ;) ) i could get about 18/19 mpg. since ULSD with the same ultra conservative driving style,it now gets 15/16.
believe it or not i have towed with it. pulled my scout to the trails a couple of times-75ish miles each way,stop/start thru towns and some good grades and i had my foot ont he floor 95% of the time. towing it got about 8mpg.
comparatively my 96 4wd dually ext cab dodge gets about the same mileage round town-15/16. best highway mielage was 23 with a pair of d70s in the bed,and kept the speed at 55. towing my 36 foot gooseneck with 2 jeeps on it to the same trails it gets 9/10. of course thats easily twice the load as the small bumperpull trailer with 1 rig on it. towing smaller trailers i get anywhere from 12-16 mpg depending onthe size,and the route.
my whole point here is that it takes a certain amount of power/energy to move a relatively unaerodynamic mass down the highway at whatever speeds.
i would not have high hopes for getting 20+ mpg in a FSJ with a small underpowered turbodiesel. even with bigger,more powerful TDs to get good mileage youll have to keep your foot out of it and your cruising speeds slow.
having said all that, i think the 4bt is the best choice for a FSJ thats purpose is mainly DD suties,and maybe some mild towing.
my truck holds 30 gallons and goes 550-650 miles per tank . . .
550/30= 18.34mpg towing & 650/30= 21.67mpg empty
so i lied its more like 18-22mpg :rolleyes:
My apologies, Maybe my turd isn't doing so bad then still doggy as piss :thumbsup:
Mike
Hubjeep
02-07-2010, 09:11 PM
http://www.4btswaps.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7042
tgreening
02-07-2010, 09:17 PM
I'm switching from 3.08's to 3.73's shortly. Gearing is fine for most of what I do, but I want to be able to do some towing. The engine puts an estimated 150HP and the truck feels faster than some 360 FSJ's that I've had.
I'm curious how you're getting 150 HP from your 4BT.
joker7037
02-07-2010, 09:30 PM
I would like to get ahold of one of our (Cummins) new light duty diesel engines. I don't know much about it except it is a V-8 and I believe it is 5 liter. It was in a new Dodge Ram 4x4 for testing not too long ago.
Mikel
02-08-2010, 03:39 AM
I'm curious how you're getting 150 HP from your 4BT.
HY35 turbo, 3200RPM governor spring, intercooler, turning the fuel pin to its deepest setting and maxing out the power screw... Again, notice I said "estimated".
tgreening
02-08-2010, 07:01 AM
HY35 turbo, 3200RPM governor spring, intercooler, turning the fuel pin to its deepest setting and maxing out the power screw... Again, notice I said "estimated".
I'm not disputing your claim. I just want to know how you did it. I have one I'm putting in a J20 and I'm curious what power improvements I can make during install without having to crack open the motor. Since an intercooled 4BT is factory rated @120 I don't see your estimate as unreasonable I "guess". I guess only because I don't know what mods net what as far as HP/torque go.
I'd like to keep mine stock as far as the turbo and injectors go (for now at least) and see what I can get with just tuning. I don't intend to go after maximum numbers but I'd like to get what I can out of the relatively stock set up.
scotty
02-08-2010, 07:29 AM
granted i dont know alot about the 4bt,but with an intercooler and pump tweeks 150 seems like quite a reasonable estimation to me.
with mods a VE pumped 6bt is capable of about twice that with 2 more cyls.
id love to stuff a 4bt into my DD xj :drivin:
Mikel
02-08-2010, 10:44 AM
I'm not disputing your claim. I just want to know how you did it. I have one I'm putting in a J20 and I'm curious what power improvements I can make during install without having to crack open the motor. Since an intercooled 4BT is factory rated @120 I don't see your estimate as unreasonable I "guess". I guess only because I don't know what mods net what as far as HP/torque go.
I'd like to keep mine stock as far as the turbo and injectors go (for now at least) and see what I can get with just tuning. I don't intend to go after maximum numbers but I'd like to get what I can out of the relatively stock set up.
Hello,
No offense taken at all. If you haven't already, I would visit www.4btswaps.com (http://www.4btswaps.com) There is tons of information on the matter there. I have seen dyno numbers of a stock CPL 858 4BT (the most common breadvan, non intercooled type) reaching 188HP and about 400lbs-ft to the flywheel just playing with the pump. I would think mine is at about that level, but I do have to keep an eye on the EGT's, which force me to take my foot of the gas sometimes, specially during long uphill stretches of highway.
Easy things I haven't done yet is advancing the timing (bolts behind pump are hard to reach) and replacing the injectors (easy but $$). I hope bumping the timing will bring me closer to 200HP.
Mikel
dusty
02-08-2010, 02:20 PM
I'm not disputing your claim. I just want to know how you did it. I have one I'm putting in a J20 and I'm curious what power improvements I can make during install without having to crack open the motor. Since an intercooled 4BT is factory rated @120 I don't see your estimate as unreasonable I "guess". I guess only because I don't know what mods net what as far as HP/torque go.
I'd like to keep mine stock as far as the turbo and injectors go (for now at least) and see what I can get with just tuning. I don't intend to go after maximum numbers but I'd like to get what I can out of the relatively stock set up.
click on my 4bta build thread link in my signature to see the above mentioned mods installed on 4bta and then isntalled into a jeep chief. highly recommend the intercooler.
tgreening
02-08-2010, 04:57 PM
Hello,
No offense taken at all. If you haven't already, I would visit www.4btswaps.com (http://www.4btswaps.com) There is tons of information on the matter there. I have seen dyno numbers of a stock CPL 858 4BT (the most common breadvan, non intercooled type) reaching 188HP and about 400lbs-ft to the flywheel just playing with the pump. I would think mine is at about that level, but I do have to keep an eye on the EGT's, which force me to take my foot of the gas sometimes, specially during long uphill stretches of highway.
Easy things I haven't done yet is advancing the timing (bolts behind pump are hard to reach) and replacing the injectors (easy but $$). I hope bumping the timing will bring me closer to 200HP.
Mikel
Oh yeah, been there a bunch. Enough to know that nothing brings out the accusations and finger pointing like the posts in the performance thread! Hehe. The one thing I haven't been able to find of there is a step by step performance tune on the stock setup. There's a bunch of tunes there but they're all with this turbo and that turbo, these injectors, that pump etc etc. I'd like to find the thread titled "Getting the most out of the stock intercooled 4BT."
dusty
02-09-2010, 12:22 AM
Oh yeah, been there a bunch. Enough to know that nothing brings out the accusations and finger pointing like the posts in the performance thread! Hehe. The one thing I haven't been able to find of there is a step by step performance tune on the stock setup. There's a bunch of tunes there but they're all with this turbo and that turbo, these injectors, that pump etc etc. I'd like to find the thread titled "Getting the most out of the stock intercooled 4BT."
thats your mistake. stock doesnt cut it. stock is made for the hp/ torque that it is rated for. diesels and gas are different animals.
pretty simple but you have to mix and match to make things work.
think Dodge with a 6bt with a turbo and Intercooler from 1991-1993 was capatible with 160hp/420 ft/lbs so a 4bt seeking to achieve the same hp numbers needs similar turbo cfms and intercooler surface area.
I ran a HY35/9cm combo, a later designed turbo cabable of supporting simlar 235/hp numbers and 430 ft/lbs + usually underrated added that to a intercooler of similar capacity like the 91-93 cooler and you have a combo with sufficient ooling capacity, good spool up and all using stock injectors stock pump.
a stock pump and stock injecotrs are capacble of putting out more fuel than the stock turbo and motor can cool until you upgrade. the stock fuel system can typically only cool about a 15% increase maybe 20 on a after cooled motor that is about it. It is a process read on 4btswaps.com one thing begets the other that requires the next. if youwant more powe rit is about matchint he whole system not using stock parts. stock parts are matched to the stock power ratings obviously anything over tha will require parts that acomodate hp levels over stock and changes to keep it cool
the only stock intercooled 4bt is the 4bta 130 hp the 4bta 120hp had the darned water after cooler most the time and tha tdoesnt have the surface area to support much over 2 turns of the screw. the performance section has 3 thread abotu stock tunes on different 4bts and 4btas with stock components about 140 hp is all you'll get and cool
tgreening
02-09-2010, 08:19 AM
thats your mistake. stock doesnt cut it. stock is made for the hp/ torque that it is rated for. diesels and gas are different animals.
I "get" what you are saying but some of what's over their doesn't completely support it, unless I'm completely misunderstanding you.
I'm not looking for huge numbers. I don't want to squeeze every last drop out of the motor. I found pretty much just what I was looking for in the dyno thread (of course. stupid me). A guy has a pretty much stock (parts wise) 4BT, changing only the exhaust housing and governor spring, and only tweaking everything else. He claims 162 HP and 392ft lbs TQ and claims more than acceptable EGTs with it. I would be MORE than happy with that. My superduy puts down 310 / 425. I can live with those numbers in a truck that isn't intended for extreme heavy loads.
dusty
02-09-2010, 09:32 AM
the changing of the exhaust housing causes the turbo to spool faster increasing exhaust pressures and spinning the compressor earlier and harder. pushing more air than the stock configuration was intended to do.
lets say his motor came with a 18cm exhaust housing and he drops to a 12 to increase turbo speed and does not change the compressor wheel. with the 18cm housing the turbo had less exhaust drive pressure at that level the compressor could only push so much air on the intake side now it has higher exhaust pressures pushing the compressor at higher speeds creating a situation where you have more cool air. the compressor is capable of pushing an increased amount of air where it might have only pushed 16 psi max now that same compressor might push 23-24. its a balancing act all dependant on what stock turbo he has, what the compressor side is capable of sustaining. too much drive pressure and you'll over speed the compressor and that will result in super a super heated intake charge or insufficient air. most guys have figured out by reducing the exhaust housing to a smaller size like the 12 they can get sufficent air flow to support upwards of 40-50 hp beyond stock. but that is using a non-stock exhaust housing and it depends on what the compressor side of his turbo is capable of. i can't remember so don't take this for verbatum but some turbos on the 4bts had 50 mm compressors and 18cm exhaust housings and the compressor were capable of something like up to 325 cfm but in stock for only was pushing maybe operating at 60% so 195 cfm. others came with a 16 cm exhaust housing and could push a little more air. point is dropping the exhaust housing size with an aftermarket exhaust housing or a housing from a different model engine to 14 or 12cm resulted in the turbo reaching the needed cfm levels earlier, at a lower level and pushing it further into the efficiency range.
there is a point of diminishing return where teh compressor will cease to be able to supply the air needed but alot of these turbos are not operating at max efficiency they are operating at the efficiency necessary to support stock hp levels for multiple applications hence why changing the housing allows you to unlock a little more of the stock turbo's air flow capacity.
I'm having a heck of a time trying to write this out this morning. just know the changing of the exhaust housing is a major contributor to cooling the additional fuel. the stock injectors and pump are usually capable of supporting around 160-175 hp max. thats usually what everyone is concerned with when talking about max capabilities of the motor. then we all start to swap turbos around to get it to start to spool at lower rpms, clean up the soot and push more cool air into the motor dependant on what our fueling levels are at.
sometimes though you have to increase exhaust housing size to reduce drive pressure, this will slow spool up but also will help reduce exhaust temps at some mid and higher rpm levels while raising them at lower rpm levels. it takes heat and pressure to move the turbo and the cool air it pumps keeps you from melting the pistons. So in the above example if i found that i was pushing enough fuel that the turbo was spinning 28 psi but anything past 24 psi was resulting in the exhaust temps climbing too high i might have discovered that my compressor was beyond its efficiency range. so i might decide to ditch my 12 cm housing and go to a 14 to reduce the exhaust pressure levels. my spool up would slow some but i can count on the turbo not having as much exhaust drive pressure and so the compressor will slow down some. dodges with the 6bt used to run into this they had a 56mm compressor and a 12 cm exhaust housing spool up was great, drivability and hp potential was there but under load the drive pressures were too high when you turned up the pump. the solution for some was a 14cm exhaust housing. it still allowed the turbo to spool at close to stock speeds especially since there was additional fuel and heat pushing them but on the top end it provided that little bit more exhaust flow to prevent the compressor from being overdriven.
Dont know if any of that made sense but if you start playing with exhaust housings you are no longer dealing with a stock motor.
the intercooler in my opion just helps prevent heat sinc on long towing grades etc.
I don't like pushing all my parts to thier max. i seek out the hy turbo because they are cheap usually $300 +/- it has a 54mm compressor on the early models and a 9 cm exhaust housing, the heavier compressor requires a little more pressure to get it spinning but it will push more air once it gets going and the smaller exhaust housing helps increase the drive pressre on the exhaust side to get it spinning. you have to add fuel to create the additional heat & pressure also. it's a balancing act when you want more air. i could change exhaust housings but the hy is a newer design and seems to fit the 4bt really well. id pay $100-$150 for an aftermarket exhaust housing and id still have an old turbo design and turbo or i can sell mine for $150-200 and buy anhy and have more potential down the road.
tgreening
02-09-2010, 02:53 PM
I don't like pushing all my parts to thier max. i seek out the hy turbo because they are cheap usually $300 +/- it has a 54mm compressor on the early models and a 9 cm exhaust housing, the heavier compressor requires a little more pressure to get it spinning but it will push more air once it gets going and the smaller exhaust housing helps increase the drive pressre on the exhaust side to get it spinning. you have to add fuel to create the additional heat & pressure also. it's a balancing act when you want more air. i could change exhaust housings but the hy is a newer design and seems to fit the 4bt really well. id pay $100-$150 for an aftermarket exhaust housing and id still have an old turbo design and turbo or i can sell mine for $150-200 and buy anhy and have more potential down the road.
I get the bulk of what you are saying so you're doing fine explaining. Maybe I:m the one coming up short. I don:t mind making some non stock modifications, I just didn:t want to get into changing pumps, injectors, doing head studs, O-ringing the head etc ect. I don:t have the desire to go after the kind of performance I think necessitates those kinds of changes.
Swapping in a new turbo I don:t mind as long as the cascade effect doesn:t get too extensive. OTOH, if I can jsut change the housing, maybe the gov. spring, tweak the screws etc, and get the numbers I'm after without it running on the ragged edge I'm fine with it.
I don:t intend to be putzing around with this motor on a never ending quest for more power and torque. I want to get what I want/need and then put the thing to work and be done with it.
dusty
02-09-2010, 06:23 PM
My advise go in stages. you'll keep costs down and be able to figure out what your needs are without spending buckets of cash.
install the 3k gov spring because that helps with drivability
drive the rig.
turn the full power screw in a couple of turns
drive the rig
then valuate your like and dislikes. ie too much smoke off the line or hazey and slow to spool or hot exhaust temps while cruising or hot exhaust temps when towing or both these things will help you identify and tune the system to the power level that suits your driving.
adjust some more
drive it again. you'll find the spot that seems to be the right balance of power and mileage.
O ringing the head, twin turbos, pump changes, cams and head work are all big $$$$ and not necessary.
when i did mine, my first objective was making sure that even when at WOT towing the rig would not risk melting a piston and making sure nothing was being over worked. Iknew i wanted to turn things up and i knew i wanted close to 180 hp and 420-440 ft/lbs but i also wanted the option to push thepower to 210/500 and not have exhaust heat issues. after i set that benchmark i adjusted things around under that point. to find the happy medium that worked for my driving and towing around. Nice thing about a diesel it only makes that kind of power when you pour the coal to it so everything for the most part can be regulated by your right foot, you can always go a few hp over what you think you'll need and then odds are you'll probablynever use it but its sure nice to have it when you need it.
anything under 34 psi is safe stock head bolts will suffice on a 6bt it seems 40-45 psi on stock head bolts before you have hg issues. but i think a big part is letting the rig warm up before taking it out for a drive. my rig spent very little if any time over 28 psi and really never needed to be over 24 psi but i had the fuel and throttle there that if i really needed the hp i could pull out a 32-33 psi puff and go session. injectors arent really necessary unless you end up with one that goes bad then spend the money and have them built for 20 or so hp over stock. they are easy to change out about 20 minutes (like spark plugs) and then dial back down the injection pump.
other than that i would leave the turbo till after you find the acceleration and towing power that is sufficient for your needs then decide if the egt's need some help and look at your options via turbo change or exhaust housing.
Cionsider changing the lift pump from diaphram to piston style far more reliable with todays dry fuels
on the mild end of the 4bta things 200-210 hp and below there really isnt a cascade its just tuning and adjusting to your needs. above 250 hp look out now you are double what the factory rating was and thats asking to spend money and it takes alot to get there.
Southern Gorilla
08-25-2012, 05:33 PM
I fight myself over this question all the time. The 6bt looks like the obvious choice because of all the aftermarket support and cheap mods. But all those parts and mods will also work on the 4bt. So is the 4bt the right choice? But my experience with the big diesels tells me that Caterpillar makes the most reliable, hardest working engines. Not to mention the added bonus of having that gorgeous Yellow Motor under the hood.
One thing I know for certain... if money were no object, and I could actually find one, there would be only one choice;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4S4NqqU9FQ&hd=1
That sound... oh, that sound. :eek:
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.